| Katerinka | Дата: Воскресенье, 10.05.2015, 19:54 | Сообщение # 1 |
Группа: Модераторы
Сообщений: 87499
Статус: Offline
| Разбор упражнений по трудностям | Difficulty Guide |
|
|
|
|
| Katerinka | Дата: Среда, 23.12.2020, 12:20 | Сообщение # 11 |
|
Группа: Модераторы
Сообщений: 87499
Статус: Offline
| All-Around Top 3 - Review 2020 Europeans Championships
Разбор упражнения победителей ЧЕ: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYo6TeCAlv4
Linoy Ashram 0:29 5:40 10:53 16:08
Alina Harnasko 2:13 7:24 12:34 17:49
Anastasia Salos 3:54 9:07 14:24 19:39
RESULTS
1-LINOY ASHRAM 86.85
hoop 24.00 ( 15.8 5.8 10.0 / 8.2 0.3 1.5 ) (1)
ball 21.25 ( 14.1 4.6 9.5 / 7.2 0.2 2.6 / 0.05) (2)
clubs 23.50 ( 15.5 5.5 10.0 / 8.0 0.1 1.9 ) (1)
ribbon 18.10 ( 11.8 5.2 6.6 / 6.3 0.6 3.1 ) (1)
2-ALINA HARNASKO 80.40
hoop 20.50 ( 12.8 4.5 8.3 / 7.7 0.3 2.0 ) (3)
ball 22.20 ( 15.4 4.6 10.8 / 6.8 0.8 2.4 ) (1)
clubs 20.50 ( 13.8 4.4 9.4 / 6.7 0.1 3.2 ) (3)
ribbon 17.20 ( 9.3 3.4 5.9 / 7.9 0.2 1.9 ) (2)
3-ANASTASIIA SALOS 79.75
hoop 22.70 ( 15.1 5.1 10.0 / 7.7 0.9 1.4 / 0.10) (2)
ball 18.95 ( 13.0 4.8 8.2 / 6.0 0.2 3.8 / 0.05) (3)
clubs 22.20 ( 14.4 5.3 9.1 / 7.8 0.1 2.1 ) (2)
ribbon 15.90 ( 10.1 4.7 5.4 / 5.8 0.4 3.8 ) (3)
Ashram's and Harnasko's execution scores are quite close (29.9 and 29.2), Ashram's taking the lead thank to her difficulty score (57.2 vs 51.3). Not that Harnasko's difficulty is not high in itself, but unfortunatly some things she performed weren't actually supposed to be valid (mainly: heel down during pivot, just liek Ashram by the way!, 170° side split with horizontal trunk). Salos lost the second place because of numerous big mistakes (loss of the apparatus three times), with 52.6 in D but only 27.3 in E
You will maybe notice (or if you read the intro, thanks for that!) that I didn't put any Character penalties. There are two reasons. First, I really wanted to discuss the matter with you. Second, I actually think that, among those 12 routines, some of them are definitly trying their best to meet the requirements of ''no character penalties'' and kind off succeding at it.
Interresting to notice that even with the biggest character penatly (0.7 on each routine), Ashram would still be in the lead.
The execution scores can look completely unrealistic (those gymnasts are top gymnasts, giving them 6-7 in execution is very strange) but there is a rule called ''holding your balance for 1 second''. 3 balances not hold for 1 second and that's nearly 1 point taken away. 0.5 second balance and 1 second balance look very, very different, especially when you're used to it, . The code is suppose to not give 0.5 for free just for doing a split without holding it. FIG made it very clear. I usually was ready to not penalised for a balance held 0,5 second (hello Baku 2019), but when I later saw the examples given in the FIG Technical presentation earlier this year I though ''ok, you're playing the accuracy game? let's play!''.
Also, you will also notice new penalties that I didn't use for competitions from last year on Ashram's, Harnasko's, Salos' split rotation: that's because those three gymnasts seemed to go (in most of their routines at the Europeans championships) for split arabesque with horizontal trunk (foot in releve position, heel high up or not). Unlike the penche rotation (like Ashram used to do last year) it comes with more points but also more technical requirements, which are heel high up and never touching the floor as well as horizontal trunk, parallel to the floor. Obvisouly, if I see that the gymnast's heel is touching the ground before even doing one base rotation (360°) I immediatly start to count and judge the rotation as a penche.
|
|
|
|
|
